DEAR Part 911 covers describing agency needs. Verify the Rating Before You Promise Priority.

An urgent customer request reaches your scheduler, who wants every supplier order marked priority. Before that instruction travels downstream, check the actual rated order. Customer urgency and a legally authorized priority rating are not the same thing.

Watch the DEAR Part 911 lesson

Understand the Supplement's Actual Focus

Despite its broad title, this department supplement focuses on priorities and allocations, not a general method for writing requirements. The reviewed June 2026 deviation implements the Defense Priorities and Allocations System for authorized national defense programs.

First, read current codified requirements alongside applicable DOE and NNSA deviations and your agreement. A policy flash transmits signed instructions; it is not the operative policy. Check final text, scope, later supersession, and the department's adopted federal framework.

Also, the head of contracting activity has responsibilities for ensuring that staff and contractors understand and follow the priority system. Separate those agency responsibilities from contractor duties imposed by applicable law, the actual order, and relevant contract terms.

Verify Authorized Program Applicability

The department's solicitation provision and contract clause concern authorized atomic energy programs. They do not automatically cover every Energy Department purchase. Verify the applicable prescription, the actual instrument, and the authorized program before treating a request as rated work.

Next, for a covered rated portion, the contract clause addresses acquiring needed materials, equipment, services, and facilities under the priority system. Identify that portion carefully. Do not spread its rating across unrelated projects or every purchase your company makes.

The ratings D O and D X include a program identification symbol. D X takes precedence over D O. Priority scheduling supports required delivery dates; a supplier should not interpret every priority marking as an instruction to deliver immediately.

Check Valid Rated Order Elements

Then, check the elements of a valid rated order: the rating with its program symbol, required delivery dates, an authorized signature or name, and the prescribed certification statement or equivalent. A familiar customer name alone does not establish validity.

A request saying as soon as possible does not supply the required delivery date. Seek clarification through the proper channel and preserve the answer. The scheduling team needs a usable date and valid direction, not an assumption about urgency.

Acceptance requires careful review. The priority system includes mandatory acceptance requirements, mandatory and permissive rejection rules, and response requirements. Do not assume a supplier must always accept an impossible date or that one universal response period applies.

Connect Capacity Review to Required Responses

Next, compare capacity, existing commitments, and required dates using the current rules. Obtain qualified guidance on the required response and any escalation. Your internal review process supports the decision; it does not replace an applicable legal response obligation.

Also, rating extension concerns industrial resources needed to fill rated orders across successive purchasing levels. Determine which supplier orders actually support the rated work. Follow the applicable exceptions and authorized direction instead of automatically rating every item on a purchasing list.

Never invent a rating, create an unsupported program symbol, or upgrade D O to D X. If order elements conflict or a supplier questions applicability, preserve the discrepancy and obtain clarification through authorized channels before improvising revised instructions.

For example, consider a clearly fictional company, Sage River Instrumentation. A DOE customer requests faster delivery, and Sage River's scheduler proposes marking all supplier orders urgent, including routine office purchases and parts serving an unrelated commercial customer that already has scheduled deliveries.

Separate Projects and Review Downstream Needs

First, Sage River separates the projects and examines the actual rated portion, source documents, and required dates. Its purchasing lead identifies the industrial resources needed for that portion and seeks qualified review of supplier rating extension, exceptions, and response requirements.

Then, the team retains the clarification and communicates only supported instructions to affected suppliers. It tracks acknowledgments and unresolved scheduling issues without promising that every delivery will accelerate. This handoff recommendation helps people apply, rather than expand, the actual authority.

Build an eight-field worksheet for each relevant instrument. Keep it tied to the order and its supporting records. Use the worksheet to coordinate review, not as a company authorization to create ratings or waive required responses.

Record Instrument Scope and Rating

Field one is Instrument and Rated Scope. Identify the agreement and covered portion. Field two is Rating and Program Symbol. Copy the authorized information accurately and link its source so another reviewer can distinguish confirmed terms from assumptions.

Field three is Required Delivery Dates. Record the actual dates and affected items. Field four is Authorized Order Elements. Identify the signature or name and certification evidence, noting any missing element that requires clarification through the appropriate channel.

Field five is Capacity and Response Review. Retain the capacity assessment, relevant commitments, and applicable response analysis. Identify who obtains qualified guidance. Do not let an internal scheduling meeting silently substitute for a response required by the priority rules.

Field six is Supplier Rating Extension. Identify the needed downstream resources and supported instructions. Field seven is Exceptions and Escalation. Record the applicable exception or question, source, authorized direction, and unresolved issue without creating a private company waiver.

Finally, field eight is Owner and Retained Evidence. Assign an internal coordinator and retain the order, clarifications, supplier communications, and decision record. This practical handoff supports continuity when purchasing, scheduling, and contract personnel change during performance of the rated work.

Three Operating Questions

Ask three operating questions. Is this a valid rated order for the work we are planning? Which delivery dates and response rules govern? What supplier extension, exception review, and evidence are required before we send instructions downstream to suppliers?

DEAR Part 911 preparation checklist

1. Instrument and Rated Scope
2. Rating and Program Symbol
3. Required Delivery Dates
4. Authorized Order Elements
5. Capacity and Response Review
6. Supplier Rating Extension
7. Exceptions and Escalation
8. Owner and Retained Evidence

Official sources and currency

Review date: November 7, 2026. Read current codified text alongside applicable DOE and NNSA deviations. Acquisition.gov’s July 2025 baseline does not by itself capture later changes. A policy flash transmits instructions; review its signed determination and operative final attachments, scope, and any later replacement.

• DEAR Part 911 on Acquisition.gov
• Current eCFR Part 911
• DOE class deviation and operative attachments
• Current DPAS regulations

Build your readiness baseline

Explore GovAssessment at GovSuccess to organize preparation and identify review priorities. Preparation is not official approval, a compliance certification, or an award guarantee.

Browse the DEAR summaries and watch the DEARS playlist.

General education only; not legal advice or an official acquisition interpretation. Verify current sources, solicitation instructions, actual contract terms, and applicable deviations with qualified support.